Control difuso y control de convencionalidad frente a la ley 32107 por su incompatibilidad con la constitución política del Perú y estándares internacionales
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2026-09-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Científica del Perú
Abstract
This research originated from the following problem: In what way does Law No. 32107 contravene the Political Constitution of Peru and the international treaties to which Peru is a party? The objective was to explain how Law No. 32107 contravenes the Political Constitution of Peru and the international treaties to which Peru is a party. The technique employed was a survey, and the instrument used was a questionnaire. The study population consisted of 55 lawyers from the Province of Maynas, Department of Loreto. A non-experimental, correlational research design was used. The research method was scientific, descriptive, and explanatory. The results indicated that Law No. 32107 contravenes the Political Constitution of Peru and international human rights treaties by establishing statutes of limitations and the principle of non-retroactivity for crimes against humanity and war crimes—measures not permitted under the international standards to which Peru is a party.
This research originated from the following problem: In what way does Law No. 32107 contravene the Political Constitution of Peru and the international treaties to which Peru is a party? The objective was to explain how Law No. 32107 contravenes the Political Constitution of Peru and the international treaties to which Peru is a party. The technique employed was a survey, and the instrument used was a questionnaire. The study population consisted of 55 lawyers from the Province of Maynas, Department of Loreto. A non-experimental, correlational research design was used. The research method was scientific, descriptive, and explanatory. The results indicated that Law No. 32107 contravenes the Political Constitution of Peru and international human rights treaties by establishing statutes of limitations and the principle of non-retroactivity for crimes against humanity and war crimes—measures not permitted under the international standards to which Peru is a party.
This research originated from the following problem: In what way does Law No. 32107 contravene the Political Constitution of Peru and the international treaties to which Peru is a party? The objective was to explain how Law No. 32107 contravenes the Political Constitution of Peru and the international treaties to which Peru is a party. The technique employed was a survey, and the instrument used was a questionnaire. The study population consisted of 55 lawyers from the Province of Maynas, Department of Loreto. A non-experimental, correlational research design was used. The research method was scientific, descriptive, and explanatory. The results indicated that Law No. 32107 contravenes the Political Constitution of Peru and international human rights treaties by establishing statutes of limitations and the principle of non-retroactivity for crimes against humanity and war crimes—measures not permitted under the international standards to which Peru is a party.
Description
Keywords
Control difuso, Control de convencionalidad, Constitución política del Perú, Ley 32107, Tratados internacionales, Diffuse judicial review, Conventionality control, Political constitution of Peru, Law 32107, International treatie
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
