Factores sociocultares en el cuidado del ambiente en el caserío Santa Ana I zona, rio Tahuayo, distrito de Fernando Lores, Maynas-Loreto 2025
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025-11-27
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Científica del Perú
Abstract
El objetivo de esta investigación fue examinar los elementos socioculturales que afectan la protección del medio ambiente en el caserío Santa Ana I zona, situado en el río Tahuayo, en el distrito de Fernando Lores; y definir los factores sociales y culturales. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 47 familias residentes en la localidad. La metodología empleada para la investigación fue una básica no experimental y descriptiva, que consistió en determinar la situación real. La encuesta administrada a la muestra en estudio y la observación directa en el área de trabajo fueron las herramientas utilizadas.
Entre los hallazgos más destacados, podemos indicar que la responsabilidad de gestionar los residuos sólidos es diversa. Así, el 53 % de la población sostiene que corresponde a la sociedad civil (población), mientras que un 32 % argumenta que recae sobre ambas partes y el 15 % afirma que es una obligación del municipio. En lo que respecta a la participación en campañas de limpieza, hay un alto porcentaje (49%) que participa regularmente, un 28% que a veces lo hace y por último, un 23% que nunca participa. El 49% de la gente corrige a las personas cuando estas tiran desechos sólidos en el río/calle; el 34% les enseña; y al 17% no les importa. El 81% de los encuestados reconoce la relevancia y las ventajas del medioambiente. Por último, cabe señalar que el 96% de la población obtiene agua del río Tahuayo para sus servicios principales, mientras que otro grupo menor se abastece a partir de las lluvias. According to the survey respondents, a significant percentage of the population (74%) lacks knowledge about recycling. On the other hand, 87% of respondents stated that they had participated in initiatives related to environmental protection.
The objective of this research was to examine the sociocultural elements that affect environmental protection in the Santa Ana I area, located on the Tahuayo River in the Fernando Lores district, and to define the social and cultural factors. The sample consisted of 47 families residing in the town. The research methodology used was a basic, non-experimental, descriptive approach, which consisted of determining the actual situation. The survey administered to the study sample and direct observation in the work area were the tools used. Among the most notable findings, we can point out that the responsibility for managing solid waste varies. Thus, 53% of the population believes it falls to civil society (the population), while 32% argue that it falls to both parties, and 15% affirm that it is the municipality's obligation. Regarding participation in cleanup campaigns, there is a high percentage (49%) who participate regularly, 28% who do so sometimes, and finally, 23% who never participate. 49% of people correct others when they throw solid waste into the river or street; 34% teach them; and 17% don't care. 81% of respondents recognize the importance and benefits of environmental protection. Finally, it should be noted that 96% of the population obtains water from the Tahuayo River for their primary services, while a smaller group receives its supply from rainfall. According to respondents, a significant percentage of the population (74%) is aware of recycling; this is due to having received training from private institutions that have implemented various projects in the community. This is demonstrated by the question in which 87% of respondents stated they had collaborated on initiatives related to environmental care.
The objective of this research was to examine the sociocultural elements that affect environmental protection in the Santa Ana I area, located on the Tahuayo River in the Fernando Lores district, and to define the social and cultural factors. The sample consisted of 47 families residing in the town. The research methodology used was a basic, non-experimental, descriptive approach, which consisted of determining the actual situation. The survey administered to the study sample and direct observation in the work area were the tools used. Among the most notable findings, we can point out that the responsibility for managing solid waste varies. Thus, 53% of the population believes it falls to civil society (the population), while 32% argue that it falls to both parties, and 15% affirm that it is the municipality's obligation. Regarding participation in cleanup campaigns, there is a high percentage (49%) who participate regularly, 28% who do so sometimes, and finally, 23% who never participate. 49% of people correct others when they throw solid waste into the river or street; 34% teach them; and 17% don't care. 81% of respondents recognize the importance and benefits of environmental protection. Finally, it should be noted that 96% of the population obtains water from the Tahuayo River for their primary services, while a smaller group receives its supply from rainfall. According to respondents, a significant percentage of the population (74%) is aware of recycling; this is due to having received training from private institutions that have implemented various projects in the community. This is demonstrated by the question in which 87% of respondents stated they had collaborated on initiatives related to environmental care.
Description
Keywords
Factores socioculturales, Medio ambiente, Recursos naturales, Sociocultural factors, Environment, Natural resources
Citation
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
