Inconstitucionalidad de la ley 32130 y su impacto en la autonomía del ministerio público en la provincia de maynas, año 2024
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025-09-03
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Científica del Perú
Abstract
La presente investigación partió del problema ¿De qué manera la Ley 32130 impacta la autonomía constitucional del Ministerio Público? Y el objetivo fue: Determinar de qué manera la Ley 32130 impacta la autonomía constitucional del Ministerio Público. La técnica que se empleó fue la encuesta y el instrumento fue el cuestionario. La población estuvo conformada por 65 abogados de la Provincia de Maynas del Departamento de Loreto, especializados en Derecho penal y constitucional. El diseño que se empleó fue no experimental de tipo correlacional. El método de investigación fue Científico -Descriptivo – Explicativo. Los resultados indicaron que: La modificación del artículo IV del Código Procesal Penal de la Ley 32130 contraviene significativamente la autonomía constitucional del Ministerio Público, vulnerando los artículos 158° y 159° inciso 4 de la Constitución Política del Perú, al limitar su facultad constitucional de conducción plena de la investigación del delito en la provincia de Maynas.
This research project was based on the question: How does Law 32130 impact the constitutional autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office? The objective was to determine how Law 32130 impacts the constitutional autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office. The technique used was a survey, and the instrument was a questionnaire. The sample consisted of 65 lawyers from the Province of Maynas, Department of Loreto, specializing in criminal and constitutional law. The design used was non-experimental and correlational. The research method was scientific-descriptive-explanatory. The results indicated that: The amendment to Article IV of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Law 32130 significantly contravenes the constitutional autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office, violating Articles 158 and 159, paragraph 4, of the Peruvian Political Constitution, by limiting its constitutional power to fully conduct criminal investigations in the province of Maynas
This research project was based on the question: How does Law 32130 impact the constitutional autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office? The objective was to determine how Law 32130 impacts the constitutional autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office. The technique used was a survey, and the instrument was a questionnaire. The sample consisted of 65 lawyers from the Province of Maynas, Department of Loreto, specializing in criminal and constitutional law. The design used was non-experimental and correlational. The research method was scientific-descriptive-explanatory. The results indicated that: The amendment to Article IV of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Law 32130 significantly contravenes the constitutional autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office, violating Articles 158 and 159, paragraph 4, of the Peruvian Political Constitution, by limiting its constitutional power to fully conduct criminal investigations in the province of Maynas
Description
Keywords
Autonomía del Ministerio Público, Inconstitucionalidad de la Ley, Director de la Investigación, Policía Nacional del Perú, Autonomy of the Public Prosecutor's Office, Unconstitutionality de la Ley, Director of Research, National Police of Peru
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
